The local-relationship Danish SAT choice.
CyberPilot is the right vendor if your buying decision values a local Danish vendor relationship over architectural depth. The product delivers what SAT was designed to deliver, and many Danish organizations have run with it for years.
CyberPilot is a defensible choice if:
- You value a Danish-headquartered vendor relationship as a primary criterion
- Your program runs on scheduled simulations and compliance training
- Your board is satisfied with engagement metrics
- You're not yet under NIS2 21(2)(f) board-level evidence pressure
- You don't yet need human risk signal in your SOC
Moxso is also Danish. And it's a different category.
Two things matter most when comparing CyberPilot and Moxso:
Same country, different category. Moxso is built in Copenhagen, hosted on Scaleway in EU, ISO 27001:2022 certified, GDPR-native. The local-vendor argument applies to Moxso too. The architectural argument does not apply to CyberPilot.
Three signals connected, audit-defensible at the calculation level. CyberPilot produces SAT reports. Moxso produces a methodology-versioned Resilience Score pre-mapped to NIS2 21(2)(f), drillable to the individual driving risk, with continuous OSINT routed to exposed users.
The Signal Bus carries human risk into Splunk, Sentinel, XSOAR, CrowdStrike, and the identity layer at Defend tier. Sixteen risk categories. Nine languages native. Methodology versioned and published.
When to stay. When to switch.
Stay with CyberPilot if your buying decision is primarily about local relationship and your program is satisfying current compliance requirements.
Switch to Moxso if any of these is true:
- NIS2 21(2)(f) board-level evidence is now on your audit committee's agenda
- The board has asked for a human risk number quarter on quarter
- You're seeing AI-driven attacks your current program has no category for
- The SOC has asked for human risk signal in the SIEM
- You want a Danish vendor and the architecture of an HRI platform
The local-relationship argument doesn't require giving up architectural depth. Moxso is also Danish.
At renewal or when audit forces it.
CyberPilot-to-Moxso replacements happen most often at the renewal point or when a NIS2 audit forces the conversation. The SAT capabilities, phishing, training, reporting, are part of the Moxso replacement, not a separate purchase. Two weeks for Essential, three to four for Adapt.
Twenty minutes. Bring your CyberPilot report.
We will read your most recent CyberPilot quarterly through the Moxso engine and walk you through what a Danish-vendor architectural upgrade looks like. No nurture sequence. One working day to a slot.