A strong fit if your goal is individualized awareness.
Hoxhunt does individualized awareness well. The product is mature, the content library is deep, and the engagement model works. If your program is at maturity stage two, individualized awareness, Hoxhunt is a defensible choice and switching to Moxso may not justify the effort yet.
You're at maturity stage two if:
- You have phishing simulations and training running consistently
- Your CISO or Head of IT can show department-level risk variation
- The board is satisfied with completion and click rate metrics
- You don't yet face NIS2 21(2)(f) board-level evidence demands
- You're not yet asked to feed human risk signal into your SIEM or SOC
If all five of those are true today, stay with Hoxhunt and revisit when one of them changes.
Moxso is the next category up.
Three architectural moves Hoxhunt was not built to make:
Three signals connected, not one. Hoxhunt reads behavior. Moxso reads behavior, live OSINT classified by industry and region, and organizational weight by role and access. The Resilience Score stacks all three. The reason a CFO's click and an intern's click weigh differently.
Audit-defensible at the calculation level. Hoxhunt produces engagement metrics. Moxso produces a methodology-versioned, auditor-reviewed Resilience Score pre-mapped to NIS2 21(2)(f), ISO 27001, and DORA. The auditor reads the methodology document before the call.
The Signal Bus. At Defend tier, Moxso carries human risk into Splunk, Sentinel, XSOAR, CrowdStrike, and the identity layer. Hoxhunt is an awareness platform. Moxso is a signal source for the rest of the stack.
Continuous OSINT routed to exposed users. Sixteen risk categories including HUAI and AAI for AI-driven human risk. Methodology you can read before you buy. None of this is in Hoxhunt's scope.
When to stay. When to switch.
Stay with Hoxhunt if your program is mature at maturity stage two and your board, auditor, and SOC are not yet asking for what stage three produces.
Switch to Moxso if any of these is true:
- The board has asked for a number you can defend, and completion rates are no longer enough
- The auditor is preparing for a NIS2 21(2)(f) review and your current evidence layer is gap-coverage
- The SOC wants human risk signal carried into the SIEM, not exported as a CSV
- You're seeing AI-driven attacks (deepfake voice, executive impersonation, agentic phishing) and your current program has no category to capture them
- You're a multi-country business and your program is duplicating effort across regions instead of inheriting framework
The replacement is not partial. Moxso includes the SAT capabilities Hoxhunt provides, phishing simulations, adaptive training, native nine-language delivery, and adds the architecture that produces evidence. Customers do not run Moxso alongside Hoxhunt. They replace, in a single rollout.
Engineered as a single rollout.
The replacement is engineered to be a single rollout, not a parallel deployment. Two weeks for Essential tier, three to four for Adapt, six to eight for Defend. Resilience Score history starts on day one. The SAT capabilities your team relies on, phishing, training, reporting, are part of the replacement, not bolted on after.
Most Hoxhunt-to-Moxso replacements happen at the Hoxhunt renewal point. Some happen mid-term when a regulatory deadline forces it.
Twenty minutes. Bring your Hoxhunt report.
We will read your last Hoxhunt quarterly report through the Moxso engine, name the NIS2 evidence gap explicitly, and walk you through what a replacement plan would look like in your environment. No nurture sequence. One working day to a slot.