How to Prevent Swatting Effectively and Safely
Swatting is a dangerous and illegal practice that has emerged in the digital age, primarily within the online gaming community. It involves making a false report to emergency services in an attempt to dispatch large numbers of law enforcement or emergency response teams to a specific address. Swatting attacks have targeted both high-profile figures and everyday individuals, highlighting the serious consequences of such incidents. This glossary will delve into the intricacies of swatting, its origins, implications, and ways to prevent it.
Swatting is not just a prank, but a serious crime with potentially deadly consequences. It is a form of harassment and intimidation that can lead to severe trauma and even loss of life. Understanding swatting is crucial in the age of increasing digital threats and cybercrimes.
What is Swatting?
Swatting is a form of harassment where an individual or group makes a false report to local law enforcement, typically by calling the local police department, with the intention of prompting a SWAT team response to a victim’s location. This can be done through various means, including voice-over-IP services, burner phones, phone-enabled chat services, and dark web-advertised services. Swatting is often used to inconvenience the victim and those around them, and sometimes the attacker hopes that the victim is harmed or killed.
Origins of swat team
The term ‘swatting’ originates from the acronym SWAT (Special Weapons and Tactics), a specialized group within U.S. law enforcement agencies that respond to high-risk situations such as hostage scenarios or terrorist threats. Swatting incidents often involve SWAT teams being deployed in response to fraudulent calls, sometimes leading to tragic outcomes for innocent victims. Swatting began as a malicious prank within the online gaming community but has since spread to other areas of the internet.
Swatting incidents often involve the caller disguising their identity and location, making it difficult for authorities to trace the call. The first known case of swatting dates back to 2007, and since then, the practice has grown in prevalence, spurred on by the anonymity provided by the internet.
The gaming community, particularly those involved in live streaming their gameplay, have been primary targets of swatting due to the public nature of their online presence. The live streaming of the police response adds a level of ‘entertainment’ for the perpetrator.
Swatting incidents in the gaming community have led to serious consequences, including the death of an innocent man in Wichita, Kansas, in 2017, when a dispute over a $1.50 bet in a Call of Duty game led to a swatting incident.
Motivations and Targets
Swatting can be motivated by a desire for revenge, a prank, or financial gain. Swatters often target online gamers, live streamers, and individuals who give away too much information about themselves online. Swatting can also be used against various targets, including Xbox executives, judges, prosecutors, politicians, pundits, and celebrities. In some cases, swatters may target individuals or groups based on their race, sexual orientation, or religion. Swatting can also be used to extort money or cause mayhem.
Notable Swatting Incidents
There have been several high-profile swatting incidents in recent years. For example, in 2017, a Wichita police officer killed Andrew Finch, 28, after responding to a false report of a homicide and hostage situation. In 2020, the home of Black Lives Matter activist Melina Abdullah was surrounded by Los Angeles police after a swatting attack. Swatting incidents can have serious consequences, including death, and can cause significant emotional trauma and PTSD for the victims.
Implications of swatting incidents
Swatting is not a harmless prank; it is a serious crime with severe implications. It puts innocent people in danger, wastes law enforcement resources, and can result in serious legal consequences for the perpetrator.
When false reports are made in swatting incidents, law enforcement agencies respond as if the threat is real. This can lead to traumatic experiences for the victims who are often unaware of why they are being targeted. In some cases, victims have been seriously injured or killed during the response.
Legal consequences of false report
Swatting is illegal and making a false claim to emergency services can result in serious legal consequences. In the United States, swatting can lead to charges such as making terroristic threats, falsely reporting an incident, and reckless endangerment. If a swatting incident results in death, the perpetrator can be charged with manslaughter.
In addition to criminal charges, perpetrators can also face civil lawsuits from victims seeking compensation for emotional distress, property damage, and other harms caused by the swatting incident.
Preventing swatting
Preventing swatting is challenging due to the anonymity provided by the internet. Social media platforms are often a source where personal information can be gathered by cybercriminals. However, there are steps individuals can take to protect themselves. These include being cautious about sharing personal information online, using VPNs to hide IP addresses, and taking steps to secure online accounts.
Law enforcement agencies are also working to combat swatting by educating the public about the risks and consequences, developing technology to trace anonymous calls, and working with online platforms to identify and ban users who engage in swatting.
Steps for individuals
Individuals can take several steps to protect themselves from swatting. Bomb threats are a serious aspect of swatting, where false reports can lead to evacuations and police action. These include being cautious about what personal information they share online, particularly their home address. Using a VPN can also help by hiding the individual’s IP address, making it more difficult for a potential swatter to locate them.
Securing online accounts is also crucial. This includes using strong, unique passwords for each account, enabling two-factor authentication where available, and being cautious about clicking on links or downloading attachments from unknown sources.
Steps for local law enforcement
Police departments are also taking steps to combat swatting. Many agencies now offer ‘swatting registries’ where individuals who believe they may be at risk can register their address. If a call is made to that address, the police will know it may be a swatting attempt and can respond accordingly.
Law enforcement is also working to develop technology to trace anonymous calls and working with online platforms to identify and ban users who engage in swatting. Education is also a key part of prevention, with many agencies offering resources to help the public understand the risks and consequences of swatting.
Swatting is a serious and dangerous crime that has emerged in the digital age. It is not a harmless prank but a form of harassment and intimidation that can have severe consequences. Understanding swatting, its implications, and how to prevent it is crucial in the age of increasing digital threats and cybercrimes.
As we continue to navigate the digital age, it is crucial that we remain vigilant and proactive in protecting ourselves and our communities from threats like swatting. By understanding the origins, implications, and prevention strategies, we can work together to combat this dangerous practice.
This post has been updated on 19-11-2024 by Sofie Meyer.

About the author
Sofie Meyer is a copywriter and phishing aficionado here at Moxso. She has a master´s degree in Danish and a great interest in cybercrime, which resulted in a master thesis project on phishing.